Re: [PATCH 2/2 v5] iio: Add SEMTECH SX9310/9311 sensor driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:46 PM Daniel Campello <campello@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add SEMTECH SX9310/9311 driver.
>
> The device has the following entry points:
>
> Usual frequency:
> - sampling_frequency
> - sampling_frequency_available
>
> Instant reading of current values for different sensors:
> - in_proximity0_raw
> - in_proximity1_raw
> - in_proximity2_raw
> - in_proximity3_comb_raw
> and associated events in events/

...

> +#include <linux/acpi.h>

> +#include <linux/of.h>

No users for these (see ID table handling below), but property.h would
be needed.

...

> +#define   SX9310_EVENT_IRQ                             (SX9310_FAR_IRQ | \
> +                                                        SX9310_CLOSE_IRQ)

Better formatting is
#define FOO \
  (BAR | ZOO)

...

> +struct sx9310_data {

> +       struct i2c_client *client;

Do you really need client? Perhaps struct device will be enough?

> +       struct iio_trigger *trig;
> +       struct regmap *regmap;
> +       /*
> +        * Last reading of the proximity status for each channel.
> +        * We only send an event to user space when this changes.
> +        */
> +       bool prox_stat[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS];
> +       bool trigger_enabled;

> +       __be16 buffer[SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS +
> +                     4]; /* 64-bit data + 64-bit timestamp */

Please, fix formatting.

> +};

...

> +static int sx9310_update_chan_en(struct sx9310_data *data,
> +                                unsigned int chan_read,
> +                                unsigned int chan_event)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +

> +       if ((data->chan_read | data->chan_event) != (chan_read | chan_event)) {
> +               ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9310_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
> +                                        SX9310_CHAN_ENABLED_MASK,
> +                                        chan_read | chan_event);

unsigned int readevent = chan_read | chan_event;
...
if (... != readevent) {
  ..., readevent);
}

> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
> +       data->chan_read = chan_read;
> +       data->chan_event = chan_event;
> +       return 0;
> +}

...

> +static int sx9310_read_prox_data(struct sx9310_data *data,
> +                                const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, __be16 *val)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, SX9310_REG_SENSOR_SEL, chan->channel);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;
> +

> +       return regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, chan->address, val, 2);

sizeof()?

> +}

...

> +       if (data->client->irq > 0) {
> +               ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&data->completion);
> +               reinit_completion(&data->completion);

Logically reinit better to be called before you start measurement.

> +       } else {
> +               ret = sx9310_wait_for_sample(data);
> +       }

...

> +       *val = sign_extend32(be16_to_cpu(rawval),
> +                            (chan->address == SX9310_REG_DIFF_MSB ? 11 : 15));

Too many parentheses.

...

> +       mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> +
> +       ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, SX9310_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
> +                                SX9310_SCAN_PERIOD_MASK,
> +                                i << SX9310_SCAN_PERIOD_SHIFT);
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);

Btw, can you use locking provided by regmap?

...

> +       /*
> +        * Even if no event is enabled, we need to wake the thread to

> +        * clear the interrupt state by reading SX9310_REG_IRQ_SRC.  It

Move it to the next line.

> +        * is not possible to do that here because regmap_read takes a
> +        * mutex.
> +        */

...

> +       for (chan = 0; chan < SX9310_NUM_CHANNELS; chan++) {
> +               int dir;
> +               u64 ev;
> +               bool new_prox = val & BIT(chan);
> +

> +               if (!(data->chan_event & BIT(chan)))
> +                       continue;

for_each_set_bit()

> +               if (new_prox == data->prox_stat[chan])
> +                       /* No change on this channel. */
> +                       continue;

> +       }

...

> +static struct attribute *sx9310_attributes[] = {
> +       &iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,

> +       NULL,

Comma is not needed for terminator.

> +};

...

> +static int sx9310_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> +       struct sx9310_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +       unsigned int channels = 0;
> +       int bit, ret;
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> +       for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> +                        indio_dev->masklength)

> +               channels |= BIT(indio_dev->channels[bit].channel);

unsigned long channels;
...
__set_bit(...);

> +       ret = sx9310_update_chan_en(data, channels, data->chan_event);
> +       mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> +       return ret;
> +}

...

> +#define SX_INIT(_reg, _def)                    \
> +       {                                       \
> +               .reg = SX9310_REG_##_reg,       \
> +               .def = _def,                    \
> +       }

Usually it's a good tone to #undef custom macro when they are not
needed anymore.

...

> +       for (i = 100; i >= 0; i--) {
> +               msleep(20);
> +               ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, SX9310_REG_STAT1, &val);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto out;
> +               if (!(val & SX9310_COMPSTAT_MASK))
> +                       break;
> +       }

NIH of regmap_real_poll_timeout();

> +
> +       if (i < 0) {
> +               dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> +                       "initial compensation timed out: 0x%02x", val);
> +               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +       }

...

> +               ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, initval->reg, initval->def);
> +               if (ret < 0)

Do you need all these ' < 0'?

> +                       return ret;

...

> +       const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;

> +       /* id will be NULL when enumerated via ACPI */
> +       if (id) {
> +               if (id->driver_data != whoami)
> +                       dev_err(dev, "WHOAMI does not match i2c_device_id: %s",
> +                               id->name);
> +       } else if (ACPI_HANDLE(dev)) {
> +               acpi_id = acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, dev);
> +               if (!acpi_id)
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +               if (acpi_id->driver_data != whoami)
> +                       dev_err(dev, "WHOAMI does not match acpi_device_id: %s",
> +                               acpi_id->id);
> +       } else
> +               return -ENODEV;

device_get_match_data().

...

> +static int sx9310_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +                       const struct i2c_device_id *id)

Can you switch to ->probe_new()?

...

> +       indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));

> +       if (indio_dev == NULL)

if (!indio_dev)

> +               return -ENOMEM;

...

> +               dev_err(&client->dev, "error in reading WHOAMI register: %d",
> +                       ret);

If you introduce temporary variable the code will be better to read

  struct device *dev = &client->dev;

> +       ret = sx9310_set_indio_dev_name(&client->dev, indio_dev, id,
> +                                       data->whoami);
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;

...

> +static const struct acpi_device_id sx9310_acpi_match[] = {
> +       { "STH9310", SX9310_WHOAMI_VALUE },
> +       { "STH9311", SX9311_WHOAMI_VALUE },

Hmm... May I ask some official proof that these IDs are real and
issued by vendor?

> +       {},

No comma.

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sx9310_acpi_match);

> +static const struct of_device_id sx9310_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "semtech,sx9310" },
> +       { .compatible = "semtech,sx9311" },

> +       {},

No comma.

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sx9310_of_match);
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id sx9310_id[] = {
> +       { "sx9310", SX9310_WHOAMI_VALUE },
> +       { "sx9311", SX9311_WHOAMI_VALUE },

> +       {},

No comma.

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, sx9310_id);

...

> +               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(sx9310_acpi_match),
> +               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sx9310_of_match),

Drop these macros. You probably didn't test with !ACPI and/or !OF --
should be compiler warning.

> +               .pm = &sx9310_pm_ops,
> +       },

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux