Hi,
Why is 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1' grouped under 'pd_vio' instead of VD_LOGIC?
Thanks
On 3/22/20 4:45 PM, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The RK3399 TRM uses both
>
> 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1'
>
> as
>
> 'pd_tcpd0, pd_tcpd1'.
>
> What should we use here?
>
> Thanks.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
>> pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
>> <&qos_isp1_m1>;
>> };
>> - pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0 {
>> + pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
>> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
>> <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> };
>> - pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1 {
>> + pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
>> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
>> <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>
