On 19-03-20, 15:41, Sibi Sankar wrote: > Viresh, > Saravana's example does show a device > with multiple opp tables but doesn't > need multiple opp table support to > land though (since it works fine with > the current implementation). I am more > interested in understanding your/ > Stephen's/Saravana's stance on adding > multiple opp-table support. Personally > I feel its inevitable, since multiple > qc drivers using interconnect opp-tables, > routinely need vote on multiple paths in > a non-trivial manner. The OPP core doesn't support multiple OPP tables for a device and I don't understand how it will. And so I have been waiting for a reply. > > > > Could you please post a link to the discussion that you are referring to > > here? > > I looked at a few links posted in the cover letter as dependencies and > > it seems > > like the discussions are pending for *months* and not weeks but I > > might have looked > > at the wrong ones. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200114103448.odnvqawnqb3twst5@vireshk-i7/ > > Rajendra, > Viresh is referring to ^^ one Right, thanks. -- viresh
