> (perhaps i2c_verify_client() checking dev was not such a great idea, as > callers need to act on dev && !verified anyway?) Can be argued. I will have a second thought about it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> (perhaps i2c_verify_client() checking dev was not such a great idea, as > callers need to act on dev && !verified anyway?) Can be argued. I will have a second thought about it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
|