On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC. Driver using
> compatible data to store different RTC_WRTGR address offset.
> This replace RTC_WRTGR to RTC_WRTGR_MT6323 in mt6323-poweroff
> driver which only needed by armv7 CPU without ATF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c | 2 +-
> drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c b/drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c
> index 1caf43d..0532803 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void mt6323_do_pwroff(void)
> int ret;
>
> regmap_write(pwrc->regmap, pwrc->base + RTC_BBPU, RTC_BBPU_KEY);
> - regmap_write(pwrc->regmap, pwrc->base + RTC_WRTGR, 1);
> + regmap_write(pwrc->regmap, pwrc->base + RTC_WRTGR_MT6323, 1);
>
> ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(pwrc->regmap,
> pwrc->base + RTC_BBPU, val,
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> index cda238d..7a5a9e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> @@ -9,18 +9,38 @@
> #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/rtc.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h>
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>
> +static const struct mtk_rtc_data mt6358_rtc_data = {
> + .wrtgr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6358,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_rtc_data mt6397_rtc_data = {
> + .wrtgr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6397,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc",
> + .data = (void *)&mt6397_rtc_data, },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-rtc",
> + .data = (void *)&mt6358_rtc_data, },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc",
> + .data = (void *)&mt6397_rtc_data, },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match);
> +
> static int mtk_rtc_write_trigger(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc)
> {
> int ret;
> u32 data;
>
> - ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_WRTGR, 1);
> + ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + rtc->data->wrtgr, 1);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -269,6 +289,9 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> rtc->addr_base = res->start;
>
> + rtc->data = (struct mtk_rtc_data *)
> + of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +
> rtc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (rtc->irq < 0)
> return rtc->irq;
> @@ -325,13 +348,6 @@ static int mt6397_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_rtc_suspend,
> mt6397_rtc_resume);
>
> -static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc", },
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc", },
> - { }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match);
> -
> static struct platform_driver mtk_rtc_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mt6397-rtc",
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> index 7dfb63b..66534ed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
> #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY BIT(6)
> #define RTC_BBPU_KEY (0x43 << 8)
>
> -#define RTC_WRTGR 0x003c
> +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6358 0x3a
> +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6397 0x3c
> +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6323 RTC_WRTGR_MT6397
>
> #define RTC_IRQ_STA 0x0002
> #define RTC_IRQ_STA_AL BIT(0)
> @@ -65,6 +67,10 @@
> #define MTK_RTC_POLL_DELAY_US 10
> #define MTK_RTC_POLL_TIMEOUT (jiffies_to_usecs(HZ))
>
> +struct mtk_rtc_data {
> + u32 wrtgr;
> +};
Do you expect to add more properties to this struct?
If not, it seems a bit overkill.
> struct mt6397_rtc {
> struct device *dev;
> struct rtc_device *rtc_dev;
> @@ -74,6 +80,7 @@ struct mt6397_rtc {
> struct regmap *regmap;
> int irq;
> u32 addr_base;
> + const struct mtk_rtc_data *data;
'data' is a terrible variable name.
Why do you need to store this?
It's one variable which is used once AFAICT.
> };
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_MFD_MT6397_RTC_H_ */
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
