On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 21:06, Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 2020-03-09 15:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> > > > > LS1028A has a functional connection to the eDMA module. Even if the > > spi-fsl-dspi.c driver is not using DMA for LS1028A now, define the > > slots > > in the DMAMUX for connecting the eDMA channels to the 3 DSPI > > controllers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > index 515e0a1b934f..18155273a46e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > @@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > clock-names = "dspi"; > > clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>; > > + dmas = <&edma0 0 62>, <&edma0 0 60>; > > + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; > > minor nit. Other nodes specified the dma channels as > > dma-names = "tx", "rx"; > dmas = <&edma0 0 62>, > <&edma0 0 60>; > > -michael > Does it matter? Regards, -Vladimir
