On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 4:34 AM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They
> are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the parent bus. At this
> point it probably can't be fixed.
Another option is for platform code to fixup the live DT and just add
'ranges' to make this work.
> On an OLPC XO-1.75 machine, the muxes are children of the intc, not the
> axi bus, and thus of_address_to_resource() won't work. We should treat
> the values as mere integers as opposed to bus addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Changes since v4 of "MMP platform fixes" set:
> - Add a comment, as suggested by Pavel
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix up typoes in the comment
> - Do not allow the regs property be larger than the bindings document.
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c
> index 14618dc0bd396..e41e47ab71d3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c
> @@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(mmp2_intc, "mrvl,mmp2-intc", mmp2_of_init);
> static int __init mmp2_mux_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> - struct resource res;
> int i, ret, irq, j = 0;
> u32 nr_irqs, mfp_irq;
> + u32 reg[4];
>
> if (!parent)
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -438,18 +438,22 @@ static int __init mmp2_mux_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> pr_err("Not found mrvl,intc-nr-irqs property\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
> +
> + /*
> + * For historical reasons, the "regs" property of the
> + * mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc is not a regular "regs" property containing
> + * addresses on the parent bus, but offsets from the intc's base.
> + * That is why we can't use of_address_to_resource() here.
> + */
> + ret = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(node, "reg", reg,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(reg),
> + ARRAY_SIZE(reg));
> if (ret < 0) {
> pr_err("Not found reg property\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - icu_data[i].reg_status = mmp_icu_base + res.start;
Seems like it was treated as an offset already?
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 1, &res);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - pr_err("Not found reg property\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - icu_data[i].reg_mask = mmp_icu_base + res.start;
> + icu_data[i].reg_status = mmp_icu_base + reg[0];
> + icu_data[i].reg_mask = mmp_icu_base + reg[2];
This is a bit fragile as it's hard coding the cell sizes. Are they the
same for all the platforms? I'd be more comfortable doing that in
platform specific fixup code than here.
Rob
