On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:53 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:50:08PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 18:06, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:07:47PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > The hierarchical topology with power-domain should be described through
> > > > child nodes, rather than as currently described in the PSCI root node. Fix
> > > > this by adding a patternProperties with a corresponding reference to the
> > > > power-domain DT binding.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, update the example to conform to the new pattern, but also to
> > > > the adjusted domain-idle-state DT binding.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: a3f048b5424e ("dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml | 33 +++++++++----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> > > > index 0bc3c43a525a..cae668b61265 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> > > > @@ -102,11 +102,15 @@ properties:
> > > > [1] Kernel documentation - ARM idle states bindings
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
> > > >
> > > > - "#power-domain-cells":
> > > > - description:
> > > > - The number of cells in a PM domain specifier as per binding in [3].
> > > > - Must be 0 as to represent a single PM domain.
> > > > +required:
> > > > + - compatible
> > > > + - method
> > >
> > > No need to move this.
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > +patternProperties:
> > > > + "^(power-controller|power-domain)([@-].*)?$":
> > > > + $ref: "../power/power-domain.yaml#"
> > >
> > > This has to be under an 'allOf' or the rest of the properties are
> > > ignored.
> >
> > Sure, I had the feeling that something was missing. Thanks for reviewing!
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Looks like I should a v2 of the series, or do you prefer to apply some
> > of the patches before I resend?
>
> Applied 1-3. I'll wait for v2 of 4 and 5.
In order to fix all warnings by rc5, I fixed up and applied patches 4 and 5.
Rob
