> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 11:43 AM
> To: linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring
> <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; Shawn
> Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Jiri Slaby
> <jslaby@xxxxxxxx>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>; Vabhav Sharma
> <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>; Yuan Yao <yao.yuan@xxxxxxx>; Michael Walle
> <michael@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 8/9] arm64: dts: ls1028a: add "fsl,vf610-edma" compatible
>
> The bootloader does the IOMMU fixup and dynamically adds the "iommus"
> property to devices according to its compatible string. In case of the eDMA
> controller this property is missing. Add it. After that the IOMMU will work
> with the eDMA core.
It probably makes sense to have the fsl,vf610-edma as a secondary compatible. But I think it probably need an update to the binding document too(especially the compatible is required to function). Also looks like the recent update for the binding has a typo for " fsl,fsl,ls1028a-edma", can you also fix that all together?
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> index 0bf375ec959b..0843cfbe7ae1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@
>
> edma0: dma-controller@22c0000 {
> #dma-cells = <2>;
> - compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-edma";
> + compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-edma", "fsl,vf610-edma";
> reg = <0x0 0x22c0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> <0x0 0x22d0000 0x0 0x10000>,
> <0x0 0x22e0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> --
> 2.20.1
