On Wednesday 14 May 2014 06:41:15 Thomas Abraham wrote: > From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Remove the platform device instantiation for Exynos specific cpufreq > driver and add the platform device for cpufreq-cpu0 driver. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c > index b32a907..489a495 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c > @@ -232,7 +232,9 @@ void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void) > > void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void) > { > - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0); > + if (!(of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420")) && > + !(of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))) > + platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-cpu0", -1, NULL, 0); > } > Could we please come up with a way to probe this from DT in the cpufreq-cpu0 driver itself, so we don't have to add a device in every platform using it? I realize you copied it from the other platforms using this driver, but it still seems really wrong. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html