On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:57:46 +0100
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
>
> Again a magic number. I guess this came from that big "M_N" table with 4
> elements, right? Please use a define instead of hardcoding a number
> here.
Nope, it's unrelated to the cabac_table size, it's related to how the
HW accesses the P/B reflists (there are 1 P reflist, and 2 B reflists,
hence the 3 here). I guess we can have a '#define NUM_REFLISTS 3'.
