On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:30:02AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:05 -0800, rentao.bupt@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > .../... > > You haven't fixed the problem spotted by Rob which is that the example > is now out of sync, it's missing the required properties. Ahhh, now I know where my problem is.. Let me see why I cannot reproduce the error on my side; otherwise I may create more noise in my next patch set (customize device IDs/strings).. > Also long run I think best is going to have a child node per downstream > port, so we create a matching linux struct device. This will make it > easier to deal with the other device-controller in the ast2600 which is > basically one of these without a vhub above it. Maybe a dumb question: what would be the proper place to parse the child node/properties when they are added? For example, in some usb_gadget_ops callback? Cheers, Tao
