On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 17:34:06 +0100 "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 22.02.2020 um 16:57 schrieb Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:25:37 +0100 > > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This patch brings support for the JZ4780 efuse. Currently it only exposes > >> a read only access to the entire 8K bits efuse memory. > >> > >> Tested-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> [converted to yaml] > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 000000000000..09a8ef937750 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml > >> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ > >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > >> +%YAML 1.2 > >> +--- > >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml# > >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > >> + > >> +title: Ingenic JZ EFUSE driver bindings > >> + > >> +maintainers: > >> + - PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx> > >> + > >> +allOf: > >> + - $ref: "nvmem.yaml#" > >> + > >> +properties: > >> + compatible: > >> + enum: > >> + - ingenic,jz4780-efuse > >> + > >> + reg: > >> + maxItems: 1 > >> + > >> + clocks: > >> + # Handle for the ahb for the efuse. > >> + maxItems: 1 > >> + > >> + clock-names: > >> + items: > >> + - const: ahb2 > > as Rob said: probably not needed, since it is a single > > clock, and the driver uses devm_clk_get(dev, NULL), so it should be prepared > > for that without any extra work. > > The question is if a specific driver implementation should determine > what the DT requires or the other way round. I don't know... > > I did interpret Rob's comment differently: there was > > > - "clock-names" Must be "bus_clk" > > and he did say: > > 'clk' is redundant. How about 'ahb'? > > So I thought he refers to the _clk suffix? > and he said to my first try: --- > + clock-names: > + items: > + - const: bus_clk My prior comment still applies. Also, for a single clock, you don't really need a name. --- Regards, Andreas
Attachment:
pgpwX6AUL6G14.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
