Quoting Matthias Brugger and Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42) > > > > On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > > >> Hi Stephen, > > >> > > >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43) > > >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC, > > >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application. > > >>> > > >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig > > >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question? > > >>> > > >> > > >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts > > >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your > > >> tree? > > >> > > >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree. > > >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Matthias > > > > > > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too. > > > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets? > > > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4? > > > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7? > > > > > > > Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to. > > > > If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good > to me. Here comes the spilt patch sets. 1. [New] Add basic clock support for mt6765. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11395997/ 2. [PATCH v8] Add basic SoC support for mt6765 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11396019/ But it's a little bit strange I cannot find patch v8's cover-letter in patchwork. Only records which patches has been taken from v7. If resend cover-letter is required please let me know. Regards, Macpaul Lin
