Hi Rob, On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote: >> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted >> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional >> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend. Ok. > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt >> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode: >> that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt >> for details. >> + >> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver. > > The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node. > Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this? Thanks, Faiz
