On 14/02/2020 07:42, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Matthias: > > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 21:19 +0100, matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@xxxxxxxx> >> >> The mmsys block provides registers and clocks for the display >> subsystem. The binding description should therefore live together with >> the rest of the display descriptions. Move it to display/mediatek. >> > > Yes, for the upstreamed driver, only display (DRM) use mmsys clock. For > some MDP patches [1] in progress, MDP also use mmsys clock. So we just > consider what's upstreamed now? I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. Are you proposing to keep the binding description in arm/mediatek? Regards, Matthias > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11140747/ > > Regards, > CK > >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@xxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> Changes in v7: >> - move the binding description >> >> Changes in v6: None >> Changes in v5: None >> Changes in v4: None >> Changes in v3: None >> Changes in v2: None >> >> .../bindings/{arm => display}/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.txt | 0 >> 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{arm => display}/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.txt (100%) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.txt >> similarity index 100% >> rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.txt >> rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.txt > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
