On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:18 PM Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +static int sun6i_msgbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> + struct sun6i_msgbox *mbox = to_sun6i_msgbox(chan);
> + int n = channel_number(chan);
> + uint32_t msg = *(uint32_t *)data;
> +
> + /* Using a channel backwards gets the hardware into a bad state. */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(readl(mbox->regs + CTRL_REG(n)) & CTRL_TX(n))))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* We cannot post a new message if the FIFO is full. */
> + if (readl(mbox->regs + FIFO_STAT_REG(n)) & FIFO_STAT_MASK) {
> + mbox_dbg(mbox, "Channel %d busy sending 0x%08x\n", n, msg);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
This check should go into sun6i_msgbox_last_tx_done().
send_data() assumes all is clear to send next packet.
.....
> +
> + mbox->controller.dev = dev;
> + mbox->controller.ops = &sun6i_msgbox_chan_ops;
> + mbox->controller.chans = chans;
> + mbox->controller.num_chans = NUM_CHANS;
> + mbox->controller.txdone_irq = false;
> + mbox->controller.txdone_poll = true;
> + mbox->controller.txpoll_period = 5;
> +
nit: just a single space should do too.
Sorry, for some reason I thought I had replied to this patch, but
apparently not. My mistake. Do you want to revise this submission or
send another patch on top?
thanks
