On 10/02/2020 17:22, Adam Serbinski wrote:
Why are we adding exactly duplicate function of q6afe_mi2s_set_sysclk here?It isn't an exact duplicate. The reason I split off the new function is because the clock IDs for PCM overlap/duplicate the clock IDs for TDM, yet the parameters to q6afe_port_set_sysclk are not the same for PCM and TDM.
we should be able to use dai->id to make that decision. --srini
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("QUAT_PCM_RX", NULL, + 0, 0, 0, 0),
