On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:12:30PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:57 AM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Olof, > > > > Thanks a lot for your comments! > > And sorry for my delay respond! > > Actually, they apply with only minor conflicts on top of current -next. > > Bjorn, any chance we can get you to pick these up pretty soon? They > enable full use of a promising ARM developer system, the SolidRun > HoneyComb, and would be quite valuable for me and others to be able to > use with mainline or -next without any additional patches applied -- > which this patchset achieves. > > I know there are pending revisions based on feedback. I'll leave it up > to you and others to determine if that can be done with incremental > patches on top, or if it should be fixed before the initial patchset > is applied. But all in all, it's holding up adaption by me and surely > others of a very interesting platform -- I'm looking to replace my > aging MacchiatoBin with one of these and would need PCIe/NVMe to work > before I do. If you're going to be using NVMe, make sure you use a power-fail safe version; I've already had one instance where ext4 failed to mount because of a corrupted journal using an XPG SX8200 after the Honeycomb Serror'd, and then I powered it down after a few hours before later booting it back up. EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p2): INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p2): write access will be enabled during recovery JBD2: journal transaction 80849 on nvme0n1p2-8 is corrupt. EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p2): error loading journal -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up