On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 07:21:53PM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote: > Add compatibles for generic QUSB2 V2 phy which can be used for > sdm845 and sc7180. > > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml | 15 +++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml > index 90b3cc6..43082c8 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,qusb2-phy.yaml > @@ -15,10 +15,17 @@ description: > > properties: > compatible: > - enum: > - - qcom,msm8996-qusb2-phy > - - qcom,msm8998-qusb2-phy > - - qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy > + oneOf: > + - items: You can omit 'items' here. > + - enum: > + - qcom,msm8996-qusb2-phy > + - qcom,msm8998-qusb2-phy > + - qcom,qusb2-v2-phy This should not be valid alone. An SoC specific compatible is required. > + - items: > + - enum: > + - qcom,sc7180-qusb2-phy > + - qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy > + - const: qcom,qusb2-v2-phy Is your intention that qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy alone is no longer valid? Rob > reg: > maxItems: 1 > > -- > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation >
