Hi Andrew,
Thanks a lot for your comments!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2020年1月13日 18:35
> To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx;
> mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; l.subrahmanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; m.karthikeyan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx;
> catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; Mingkai Hu
> <mingkai.hu@xxxxxxx>; M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian@xxxxxxx>; Xiaowei Bao
> <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 03/12] PCI: mobiveil: Collect the interrupt related
> operations into a routine
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:45:37AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote:
> > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Collect the interrupt initialization related operations into a new
> > routine to make it more readable.
>
> I prefer the word 'function' instead of routine. Also indicate why, not only is it
> nicer but it is in preparation for EP support.
Will replace the 'routine' with 'function', it is only used in RC mode, not used in EP mode.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V9:
> > - New patch splited from the #1 of V8 patches to make it easy to review.
> >
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c | 65
> > +++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> > index 97f682ca7c7a..512b27a0536e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
> > @@ -454,12 +454,6 @@ static int mobiveil_pcie_parse_dt(struct
> mobiveil_pcie *pcie)
> > return PTR_ERR(pcie->csr_axi_slave_base);
> > pcie->pcie_reg_base = res->start;
> >
> > - /* map MSI config resource */
> > - res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> "apb_csr");
> > - pcie->apb_csr_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, res);
> > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->apb_csr_base))
> > - return PTR_ERR(pcie->apb_csr_base);
> > -
> > /* read the number of windows requested */
> > if (of_property_read_u32(node, "apio-wins", &pcie->apio_wins))
> > pcie->apio_wins = MAX_PIO_WINDOWS;
> > @@ -467,12 +461,6 @@ static int mobiveil_pcie_parse_dt(struct
> mobiveil_pcie *pcie)
> > if (of_property_read_u32(node, "ppio-wins", &pcie->ppio_wins))
> > pcie->ppio_wins = MAX_PIO_WINDOWS;
> >
> > - rp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > - if (rp->irq <= 0) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "failed to map IRQ: %d\n", rp->irq);
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -618,9 +606,6 @@ static int mobiveil_host_init(struct mobiveil_pcie
> *pcie)
> > pab_ctrl |= (1 << AMBA_PIO_ENABLE_SHIFT) | (1 <<
> PEX_PIO_ENABLE_SHIFT);
> > mobiveil_csr_writel(pcie, pab_ctrl, PAB_CTRL);
> >
> > - mobiveil_csr_writel(pcie, (PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK |
> PAB_INTP_MSI_MASK),
> > - PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB);
> > -
> > /*
> > * program PIO Enable Bit to 1 and Config Window Enable Bit to 1 in
> > * PAB_AXI_PIO_CTRL Register
> > @@ -670,9 +655,6 @@ static int mobiveil_host_init(struct mobiveil_pcie
> *pcie)
> > value |= (PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 16);
> > mobiveil_csr_writel(pcie, value, PAB_INTP_AXI_PIO_CLASS);
> >
> > - /* setup MSI hardware registers */
> > - mobiveil_pcie_enable_msi(pcie);
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -873,6 +855,46 @@ static int mobiveil_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct
> mobiveil_pcie *pcie)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int mobiveil_pcie_interrupt_init(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie) {
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = pcie->pdev;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct root_port *rp = &pcie->rp;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* map MSI config resource */
> > + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> "apb_csr");
> > + pcie->apb_csr_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->apb_csr_base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->apb_csr_base);
> > +
> > + /* setup MSI hardware registers */
> > + mobiveil_pcie_enable_msi(pcie);
>
> Does this need to come after mobiveil_pcie_init_irq_domain - given that this
> function sets up the irq domain for MSI?
No, I don't think so, because I didn't change the relative order of the 2 functions
you mentioned.
Thanks,
Zhiqiang
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
>
> > +
> > + rp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (rp->irq <= 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to map IRQ: %d\n", rp->irq);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* initialize the IRQ domains */
> > + ret = mobiveil_pcie_init_irq_domain(pcie);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed creating IRQ Domain\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(rp->irq, mobiveil_pcie_isr, pcie);
> > +
> > + /* Enable interrupts */
> > + mobiveil_csr_writel(pcie, (PAB_INTP_INTX_MASK |
> PAB_INTP_MSI_MASK),
> > + PAB_INTP_AMBA_MISC_ENB);
> > +
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > int mobiveil_pcie_host_probe(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie) {
> > struct root_port *rp = &pcie->rp;
> > @@ -906,15 +928,12 @@ int mobiveil_pcie_host_probe(struct
> mobiveil_pcie *pcie)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - /* initialize the IRQ domains */
> > - ret = mobiveil_pcie_init_irq_domain(pcie);
> > + ret = mobiveil_pcie_interrupt_init(pcie);
> > if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Failed creating IRQ Domain\n");
> > + dev_err(dev, "Interrupt init failed\n");
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(rp->irq, mobiveil_pcie_isr, pcie);
> > -
> > /* Initialize bridge */
> > bridge->dev.parent = dev;
> > bridge->sysdata = pcie;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
