Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce bus firewall controller framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:48:33PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:

> Like Robin and Sudeep here, I do not understand why the kernel should
> have any business in this, let alone allowing blocks to change owners,
> that sounds contrary to the purpose of a firewall being controlled under
> an untrusted entity (Linux).

Can we rely on there being a more trusted level of software than
Linux on a system?  It wasn't standard to have anything on 32 bit
Arm systems as far as I remember so you could end up with some IP
blocks intended to support TrustZone sitting idle.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux