27.01.2020 00:56, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: [snip] > Thinking a bit more about how to define the ICC, I'm now leaning to a > variant like this: > > interconnects = > <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMP &emc TEGRA_ICC_EMEM>, > <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPR>, > <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPW>, > <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPDMAR>, > <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPDMAW>; I forgot that each ICC path should have SRC and DST, but you got the idea. This should be a more correct variant: <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPR &mc TEGRA_ICC_MC>, <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPW &mc TEGRA_ICC_MC>, <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPDMAR &mc TEGRA_ICC_MC>, <&mc TEGRA186_MEMORY_CLIENT_BPMPDMAW &mc TEGRA_ICC_MC>; > > interconnect-names = "dma-mem", "read", "write", "dma-read", "dma-write"; ...