HI Chen-Yu and Maxime, Can you pick this up again? Yangtao On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:08 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/01/2020 14:13, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:51:27PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> On 07/01/2020 08:58, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:46:39PM +0000, Yangtao Li wrote: > >>>> There are two sensors, sensor0 for CPU, sensor1 for GPU. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Tested-on: sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra > >>> > >>> As far as I know, tested-on is not documented anywhere (and isn't > >>> really used either). I've removed it and applied, thanks! > >> > >> I think this patch should go through my tree as it refers to a commit in > >> my branch. > > > > I'm not quite sure to get why. Even though that patch depends on the > > one affecting the driver to be functional, it doesn't break anything > > when merged through arm-soc, and similarly yours doesn't affect any > > other tree if it's merged through your tree, so there's no dependency? > > Sorry, I puzzled myself, I thought you meant you applied patch 1/2 > > > -- > <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs > > Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | > <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | > <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog >
