On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:17:39 +0100 Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > overall looks good, but some small things below > > Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2020, 23:56:17 CET schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > > From: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Pinebook Pro is a RK3399 based laptop produced by Pine64. > > > > Add a basic DTS for it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 + > > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts | 626 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 627 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile > > index 48fb631d5451..9099fb7e2073 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-nanopc-t4.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-nanopi-m4.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-nanopi-neo4.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-orangepi.dtb > > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-pinebook-pro.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb > > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..d2e3d7b35cc6 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts > > @@ -0,0 +1,626 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > > +/* > > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd. > > You might want to clarify the copyright ... 2020 and Pine64-something? This is a DTS that Peter Robinson first wrote, I've just kept the copyright. > > + */ > > + > > +/dts-v1/; > > +#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h> > > +#include <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h> > > +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h> > > +#include "rk3399.dtsi" > > +#include "rk3399-opp.dtsi" > > + > > +/ { > > + model = "Pine64 Pinebook Pro"; > > + compatible = "pine64,pinebook-pro", "rockchip,rk3399"; > > + > > + chosen { > > + stdout-path = "serial2:115200n8"; > > + }; > > + > > + aliases { > > + spi0 = &spi1; > > why is this needed ... I'd think spi can just enumerate itself? This was taken from u-boot and yes I think it's not needed for both Linux and FreeBSD. > > > + }; > > + > > + backlight: backlight { > > + compatible = "pwm-backlight"; > > + enable-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + pwms = <&pwm0 0 740740 0>; > > + }; > > + > > + gpio-keys { > > + compatible = "gpio-keys"; > > + autorepeat; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&pwrbtn>; > > + > > + power { > > + debounce-interval = <100>; > > + gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > + label = "GPIO Key Power"; > > + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>; > > + wakeup-source; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + leds { > > + status = "okay"; > > new board-specific nodes don't need a status property Ok. > > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > > + > > + work-led { > > + label = "work"; > > + gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + }; > > + > > + standby-led { > > + label = "standby"; > > + gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + vcc1v8_s3: vcca1v8_s3: vcc1v8-s3 { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + regulator-name = "vcc1v8_s3"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; > > + vin-supply = <&vcc_1v8>; > > + }; > > + > > + dc_12v: dc-12v { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + regulator-name = "dc_12v"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <12000000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <12000000>; > > + }; > > + > > + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; > > + vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>; > > + }; > > + > > + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PD2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&host_vbus_drv>; > > + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host"; > > + }; > > + > > + vcc5v0_usb3_host: vcc5v0-usb3-host-regulator { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + enable-active-high; > > + gpio = <&gpio1 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&host_usb3_drv>; > > + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_usb3_host"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + }; > > + > > + vcc3v3_s0: vcc3v3-s0-regulator { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + enable-active-high; > > + gpio = <&gpio1 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&lcdvcc_en>; > > + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_s0"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + }; > > + > > + vcc_sys: vcc-sys { > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > + regulator-name = "vcc_sys"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > > + vin-supply = <&dc_12v>; > > + }; > > + > > + vdd_log: vdd-log { > > + compatible = "pwm-regulator"; > > + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 1>; > > + pwm-supply = <&vcc_sys>; > > + regulator-name = "vdd_log"; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + regulator-init-microvolt = <950000>; > > There is no init-microvolt property in mainline, I'd think bootloader should > already setup the pwm to a suitable setting? > > Not I'll fix that. > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>; > > + }; > > +}; > > + > > +&cpu_l0 { > > + cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_l>; > > +}; > > + > > +&cpu_l1 { > > + cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_l>; > > +}; > > + > > +&cpu_l2 { > > + cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_l>; > > +}; > > + > > +&cpu_l3 { > > + cpu-supply = <&vdd_cpu_l>; > > +}; > > what happened to cpu_b0 and cpu_b1 supplies? > Should probably reference the cpu_b regulator below? Yes, sorry. > > + > > +&emmc_phy { > > + status = "okay"; > > +}; > > + > > +&i2c0 { > > + clock-frequency = <400000>; > > + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>; > > + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>; > > + status = "okay"; > > [...] > > > + vdd_cpu_b: regulator@40 { > > + compatible = "silergy,syr827"; > > + reg = <0x40>; > > + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&vsel1_gpio>; > > + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PC1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > This is not yet specified in the syr82x (fan5355) bindings and > also unknown to the driver I'll have another look at the bindings, thanks. > > + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg"; > > + regulator-name = "vdd_cpu_b"; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <712500>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; > > + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>; > > + > > + regulator-state-mem { > > + regulator-off-in-suspend; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + vdd_gpu: regulator@41 { > > + compatible = "silergy,syr828"; > > + reg = <0x41>; > > + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&vsel2_gpio>; > > + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > same > > > + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg"; > > + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu"; > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <712500>; > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; > > + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>; > > + regulator-always-on; > > + regulator-boot-on; > > + vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>; > > + > > + regulator-state-mem { > > + regulator-off-in-suspend; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > +}; > > [...] > > > +&saradc { > > + status = "okay"; > > needs a vref-supply > > > +}; > > + > > +&sdmmc { > > + bus-width = <4>; > > + status = "okay"; > > + max-frequency = <20000000>; > > vmmc / vqmmc supplies? > Especially if one wants to achieve higher speeds on uhs cards. Yep, will do that. > Heiko > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <manu@xxxxxxxxxxx>