Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] pinctrl-rockchip: Change wrong initial assumptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Initially due to lack of documentation and (personal) understanding
> I assumed that the area holding the iomux settings would be separate
> from everything else, while in fact the grf registers contain not only
> pinctrl stuff but also dma, usb-phy and general soc-status settings.
> Also things like drive-strength we do not support currently are intermixed.
>
> The same is true for the pmu, which does not only contain power domains
> but also the system reset as well as well as general registers surviving
> system-resets. Additionally the rk3188 moved parts of the pull-setting
> registers into the pmu space.
>
> While this wasn't a problem until now, the upcoming rk3288 introduces
> additional changes to both the grf and pmu areas. On it even part of
> the pinmux registers move into the pmu space.
>
> The code in it's current form supports both the old as well as the
> changed bindings.
>
> As stated in the v1 thread, this is also a first step to deprecate the
> wrongly included gpio-controllers which now duplicate the recently added
> gpio-dwapb, that should be used instead.

Patched 1 thru 7 applied to the pin control tree.

We knew this would be a bumpy ride when the merging started so this
is all expected.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux