On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:26 AM David Gibson
<david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:58:23AM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> > Hi David
> >
> > On 1/16/20 1:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:16:23PM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> > > > This commit adds the possibility to add build information for a DTB.
> > > > Build information can be: build date, DTS version, "who built the DTB"
> > > > (same kind of information that we get in Linux with the Linux banner).
> > > >
> > > > To do this, an extra option "-B" using an information file as argument
> > > > has been added. If this option is used, input device tree is appended with
> > > > a new string property "Build-info". This property is built with information
> > > > found in information file given as argument. This file has to be generated
> > > > by user and shouldn't exceed 256 bytes.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx>
> > >
> > > At the very least, this patch of the series will need to be sent to
> > > upstream dtc first.
> >
> > Ok sorry. I thought that sending all the series would give more
> > information.
>
> That's fair enough, but in order to merge, you'll need to post against
> upstream dtc.
>
> > > I'm also not terribly clear on what you're trying to accomplish here,
> > > and why it's useful.
> >
> > Let's take Kernel boot at example (but could be extend to other DTB "users"
> > like U-Boot). When Linux kernel booting we get a log that gives useful
> > information about kernel image: source version, build date, people who built
> > the kernel image, compiler version. This information is useful for debug and
> > support. The aim is to get same kind of information but for the DTB.
> >
> > > Since you're doing this specifically for use with dtbs built in the
> > > kernel build, could you just use a:
> > > Build-info = /incbin/ "build-info.txt";
> > > in each of the in-kernel .dts files?
> >
> > My first idea was to not modify all existing .dts files. Adding an extra
> > option in dtc is (for me) the softer way to do it. I mean, compile
> > information should come through compiler without modify .dts files outside
> > from dtc. In this way it will be easy to everybody using dtc (inside our
> > outside Linux tree) to add dtb build info (even if they don't how to write a
> > dts file).
>
> But you're not really having this information coming from the
> compiler. Instead you're adding a compiler option that just force
> includes another file into the generated tree, and it's up to your
> build scripts to put something useful into that file.
>
> I don't really see that as preferable to modifying the .dts files.
>
> I also dislike the fact that the option as proposed is much more
> general than the name suggests, but also very similar too, but much
> more specific than the existing /incbin/ option.
>
> What might be better would be to have a dtc option which force appends
> an extra .dts to the mail .dts compiled. You can then put an overlay
> template in that file, something like:
>
> &{/} {
> linux,build-info = /incbin/ "build-info.txt;
> }
I like this suggestion either as an include another dts file or an
overlay. The latter could be useful as a way to maintain current dtb
files while splitting the source files into base and overlay dts
files.
But no, let's not prepend this with 'linux'. It's not a property
specific for Linux to consume.
Rob
