07.01.2020 19:50, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет: > > On 1/7/20 4:21 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 08:13:59PM -0800, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote: >>> This patch series moves Tegra PMC clocks from clock driver to pmc driver >>> along with the device trees changes and audio driver which uses one of >>> the pmc clock for audio mclk. >>> >>> Tegra PMC has clk_out_1, clk_out_2, clk_out_3 and blink controls which >>> are currently registered by Tegra clock driver using clk_regiser_mux and >>> clk_register_gate which performs direct Tegra PMC register access. >>> >>> When Tegra PMC is in secure mode, any access from non-secure world will >>> not go through. >>> >>> This patch series adds these Tegra PMC clocks and blink controls to >>> Tegra >>> PMC driver with PMC as clock provider and removes them from Tegra clock >>> driver. >>> >>> PMC clock clk_out_1 is dedicated for audio mclk from Tegra30 thru >>> Tegra210 >>> and clock driver does inital parent configuration for it and enables >>> them. >>> But this clock should be taken care by audio driver as there is no need >>> to have this clock pre enabled. >>> >>> So, this series also includes patch that updates ASoC driver to take >>> care of parent configuration for mclk if device tree don't specify >>> initial parent configuration using assigned-clock-parents and controls >>> audio mclk enable/disable during ASoC machine startup and shutdown. >>> >>> DTs are also updated to use clk_out_1 as audio mclk rather than extern1. >>> >>> This series also includes a patch for mclk fallback to extern1 when >>> retrieving mclk fails to have this backward compatible of new DT with >>> old kernels. >> Hi Sowjanya, >> >> this looks like it's almost ready to merge. Can you highlight if there >> are any build-time or runtime dependencies between the patches? The >> audio driver changes seem to be mostly isolated from the rest by the >> fallback implementation for legacy device trees. >> >> Is there anything that I need to keep in mind when applying these? And >> would it be fine for Mark to pick up the ASoC patches separately from >> the rest? >> >> Thierry > > Yes, ASoC patches can be picked separately. > > dependencies are b/w clock and pmc driver patches. Technically, the ASoC compatibility patches should be applied before the CaR changes. But perhaps it's not critical if audio fails during git's bisection.