On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:25 PM Bobby Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 2:32 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 03:19:49PM -0800, Robert Jones wrote:
> > > Add the compatible enum entries for Gateworks Ventana boards.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > index f79683a..8ed4c85 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > @@ -126,6 +126,22 @@ properties:
> > > - toradex,apalis_imx6q-ixora # Apalis iMX6 Module on Ixora
> > > - toradex,apalis_imx6q-ixora-v1.1 # Apalis iMX6 Module on Ixora V1.1
> > > - variscite,dt6customboard
> > > + - gw,ventana # Gateworks i.MX6DL or i.MX6Q Ventana
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw51xx
> >
> > This doesn't match what you have in dts files. Please check with:
> >
> > make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> >
> > You'll need a separate entry with 3 compatibles and 'gw,ventana' or drop
> > it.
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Sorry, I'm still getting used to the whole schema format and a bit
> confused. Can you be more specific in how it doesn't match? I looked
> at the imx6q-gw51xx.dts file where I got the entry from and it has the
> following line:
>
> compatible = "gw,imx6q-gw51xx", "gw,ventana", "fsl,imx6q";
As written, the schema would not allow this, but would allow one of these:
"gw,imx6q-gw51xx", "fsl,imx6q"
"gw,ventana", "fsl,imx6q"
The 'items' schema allows for 2 entries. So if you want/need to
support 3 entries for compatible, you need a new 'items' schema with 3
entries:
items:
- enum:
- gw,imx6q-gw51xx
- ... all the other boards listed below
- const: gw,ventana
- enum:
- fsl,imx6dl
- fsl,imx6q
> Obviously I'm only submitting the gw59xx board device trees but a
> previous version of this submission was asked to add all of the
> compatible strings for the Gateworks boards. Are you asking me to only
> post the gw59xx lines?
That's an orthogonal issue which I'll leave to the i.MX maintainers.
> >
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw52xx
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw53xx
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5400-a
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw54xx
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw551x
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw552x
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw553x
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw560x
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5903
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5904
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5907
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5910
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5912
> > > + - gw,imx6q-gw5913
> > > - const: fsl,imx6q
> > >
> > > - description: i.MX6QP based Boards
> > > @@ -152,6 +168,21 @@ properties:
> > > - ysoft,imx6dl-yapp4-draco # i.MX6 DualLite Y Soft IOTA Draco board
> > > - ysoft,imx6dl-yapp4-hydra # i.MX6 DualLite Y Soft IOTA Hydra board
> > > - ysoft,imx6dl-yapp4-ursa # i.MX6 Solo Y Soft IOTA Ursa board
> > > + - gw,ventana # Gateworks i.MX6DL or i.MX6Q Ventana
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw51xx
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw52xx
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw53xx
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw54xx
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw551x
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw552x
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw553x
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw560x
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw5903
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw5904
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw5907
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw5910
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw5912
> > > + - gw,imx6dl-gw5913
> > > - const: fsl,imx6dl
> > >
> > > - description: i.MX6SL based Boards
> > > --
> > > 2.9.2
> > >
