On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:35:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar > on the one on A31. > > Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback. > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes for v3: > - update the binding in new yaml format > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy > - items: > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy This isn't doing what you say it does. Here you're stating that there's two valid values, one that is a single element allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, and another which is a list of three elements allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy, allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy and allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, in that order. Did you run make dtbs_check and dt_bindings_check? Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
