On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:28 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 06:52:40PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > Convert the generic PCI host binding to DT schema. The derivative Juno, > > PLDA XpressRICH3-AXI, and Designware ECAM bindings all just vary in > > their compatible strings. The simplest way to convert those to > > schema is just add them into the common generic PCI host schema. > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/pci/arm,juno-r1-pcie.txt | 10 -- > > .../bindings/pci/designware-pcie-ecam.txt | 42 ----- > > .../bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt | 4 +- > > .../bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt | 101 ------------ > > .../bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml | 150 ++++++++++++++++++ > > .../bindings/pci/pci-thunder-ecam.txt | 30 ---- > > .../bindings/pci/pci-thunder-pem.txt | 7 +- > > .../bindings/pci/plda,xpressrich3-axi.txt | 12 -- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > 9 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 203 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/arm,juno-r1-pcie.txt > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie-ecam.txt > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-thunder-ecam.txt > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/plda,xpressrich3-axi.txt > > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.yaml > > ... > > > + Interrupt mapping is exactly as described in `Open Firmware Recommended > > + > > I think there's some text missing here. Removed now. The schemas capture in constraints what the missing text did in free-form. > > +allOf: > > + - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml# > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + description: Depends on the layout of configuration space (CAM vs ECAM > > + respectively). May also have more specific compatibles. > > + anyOf: > > + - description: > > + PCIe host controller in Arm Juno based on PLDA XpressRICH3-AXI IP > > + items: > > + - const: arm,juno-r1-pcie > > + - const: plda,xpressrich3-axi > > + - const: pci-host-ecam-generic > > + - description: | > > + ThunderX PCI host controller for pass-1.x silicon > > + > > + Firmware-initialized PCI host controller to on-chip devices found on > > + some Cavium ThunderX processors. These devices have ECAM-based config > > + access, but the BARs are all at fixed addresses. We handle the fixed > > + addresses by synthesizing Enhanced Allocation (EA) capabilities for > > + these devices. > > + const: cavium,pci-host-thunder-ecam > > + - description: | > > + In some cases, firmware may already have configured the Synopsys > > + DesignWare PCIe controller in RC mode with static ATU window mappings > > + that cover all config, MMIO and I/O spaces in a [mostly] ECAM > > + compatible fashion. In this case, there is no need for the OS to > > + perform any low level setup of clocks, PHYs or device registers, nor > > + is there any reason for the driver to reconfigure ATU windows for > > + config and/or IO space accesses at runtime. > > + > > + In cases where the IP was synthesized with a minimum ATU window size > > + of 64 KB, it cannot be supported by the generic ECAM driver, because > > + it requires special config space accessors that filter accesses to > > + device #1 and beyond on the first bus. > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - marvell,armada8k-pcie-ecam > > + - socionext,synquacer-pcie-ecam > > + - const: snps,dw-pcie-ecam > > + - contains: > > + enum: > > + - pci-host-cam-generic > > + - pci-host-ecam-generic > > I assume the description that talks about "Synopsys DesignWare" goes > with "pci-host-cam-generic" and "pci-host-ecam-generic"? No, it's a catch all for all other cases. I'll add a description to make the separation more clear. Using 'contains' here was leftover from when I initially kept the same separate file structure. With it all combined to 1 schema, there's really no need for that and it should be 'items' list instead. The difference is we'll fail on 'compatible = "foo,bar-pci", "pci-host-ecam-generic";' whereas that is valid for 'contains'. > I hope there > can be generic controllers using non-Synopsys IP, but I don't know > quite how the description/items/contains parts are related. The '-' are important. They separate each entry under the 'anyOf'. There are a few besides the ones listed with quirks: arch/arm/boot/dts/alpine.dtsi arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/fvp-base-revc.dts arch/arm64/boot/dts/cavium/thunder2-99xx.dtsi arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi arch/xtensa/boot/dts/virt.dts Some of these might actually be Synopsys. The entry for Synopsys is only for the not quite compliant configured IP. Note that 'pci-host-cam-generic' is unused at least by anything upstream. > > > + reg: > > + description: > > + The Configuration Space base address and size, as accessed from the parent > > + bus. The base address corresponds to the first bus in the "bus-range" > > + property. If no "bus-range" is specified, this will be bus 0 (the > > + default). > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + ranges: > > + description: > > + As described in IEEE Std 1275-1994, but must provide at least a > > + definition of non-prefetchable memory. One or both of prefetchable Memory > > + and IO Space may also be provided. > > + minItems: 1 > > + maxItems: 3 > > + > > + dma-coherent: > > + description: The host controller bridges the AXI transactions into PCIe bus > > + in a manner that makes the DMA operations to appear coherent to the CPUs. > > The "host-generic-pci.yaml" name sounds very generic, so I'm not quite > sure how to read "AXI" -- that sounds like a feature of a specific > platform? I think "dma-coherent" itself is not platform-specific. Indeed. On second thought, just 'true' here is enough as we don't need individual bindings to describe common properties over and over. Rob