On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:01:37AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-cex7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-cex7.dtsi
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..4761737e62e2
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-cex7.dtsi
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> > > +//
> > > +// Device Tree file for LX2160A-CEx7
> > > +//
> > > +// Copyright 2019 SolidRun Ltd.
> > > +
> > > +/dts-v1/;
> > > +
> > > +#include "fsl-lx2160a.dtsi"
> > > +
> > > +/ {
> > > + model = "SolidRun LX2160A COM Express Type 7 module";
> > > + compatible = "solidrun,lx2160a-cex7", "fsl,lx2160a";
> >
> > Any new compatible needs to be documented.
>
> Grepping for "lx2160a-qds" and "lx2160a-rdb" in that tree shows no
> matches. Maybe all lx2160a boards should be documented together
> when a place for such documentation is decided upon. (In other
> words, no, I'm not going to do as you requested until the existing
> boards are given the same treatment you're requesting - otherwise
> it's unfair.)
Okay, I will create a patch to document "lx2160a-qds" and "lx2160a-rdb".
Shawn
