ROHM BD71850 PMIC is almost identical to BD71847. Main difference is some initial voltage values for regulators. The BD71850 can be handled by BD71847 driver but adding own compatible makes it clearer for one who creates the DT for board containing this PMIC and allows SW to be differentiating PMICs if needed. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- This is a new patch and added to this series only to avoid conflicts with other bd718x7 changes introduced in this series. Please drop this patch if it is not Ok to apply it in this series. DT binding doc for this new compatible was sent in: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191217084824.GA26539@localhost.localdomain/ drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c index bb86ec829079..c32c1b6c98fa 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c @@ -213,6 +213,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id bd718xx_of_match[] = { .compatible = "rohm,bd71847", .data = (void *)ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847, }, + { + .compatible = "rohm,bd71850", + .data = (void *)ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847, + }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bd718xx_of_match); -- 2.21.0 -- Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC Kiviharjunlenkki 1E 90220 OULU FINLAND ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~ Simon says - in Latin please. ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~ Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
