Darren Etheridge <detheridge@xxxxxx> wrote on Tue [2014-May-06 14:58:04 -0500]: > Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote on Tue [2014-May-06 14:46:10 -0500]: > > On 05/06/2014 02:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:26:17PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: > > >> This adds the irq crossbar device node. > > >> > > >> There is a IRQ crossbar device in the soc, which > > >> maps the irq requests from the peripherals to the > > >> mpu interrupt controller's inputs. The Peripheral irq > > >> requests are connected to only one crossbar > > >> input and the output of the crossbar is connected to only one > > >> controller's input line. The crossbar device is used to map > > >> a peripheral input to a free mpu's interrupt controller line. > > >> > > >> Cc: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@xxxxxx> > > >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> [V5] Rebased on top of 3.15-rc4 and corrected the > > >> irqs-reserved list > > >> > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > >> index 149b550..0274a86 100644 > > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > >> @@ -790,6 +790,14 @@ > > >> status = "disabled"; > > >> }; > > >> }; > > >> + > > >> + crossbar_mpu: crossbar@4a020000 { > > > > > > shouldn't this be "status = disabled"; so that boards enable this > > > on-demand ?? > > > > > It cannot be and does not need to be. crossbar is an SoC feature. by > > defining crossbar, the IRQ numbers we provide in DTS now becomes > > crossbar numbers which get mapped to GIC interrupt numbers dynamically. > > > > further crossbar is not a board feature. it is as ingrained in DRA7 > > behavior as GIC is. we are fortunate that we have some default mapping > > of crossbar that allows the current peripherals to work, with this > > support, we dont have to depend any longer on "we are lucky that is > > mapped". > > > > That said, in hindsight, patch #1 and 2 should be squashed IMHO. else > > we have a bisectability problem here. > > > Yes the bisectability problem is completely true - I was just testing > that as your email came in. In fact I think all three patches need to > be squashed into one, I can't boot the dra7-EVM unless I have all three > patches applied. > Or I just tried reordering, so patch 3/3 becomes patch 1 and then squash patch 1/3 and patch 2/3 together to form patch 2. That seems to at least let the kernel boot to completion. Darren -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html