* Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> [140429 04:22]:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 04:48 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 April 2014 16:35:13 Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >> @@ -393,7 +395,12 @@ IS_OMAP_TYPE(3430, 0x3430)
> >>
> >> #if defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX)
> >> #undef soc_is_dra7xx
> >> +#undef soc_is_dra74x
> >> +#undef soc_is_dra72x
> >> #define soc_is_dra7xx() (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra7"))
> >> +#define soc_is_dra74x() (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra74"))
> >> +#define soc_is_dra72x() (of_machine_is_compatible("ti,dra72"))
> >> +
> >
> > You shouldn't normally have to define these. Why are they needed?
> >
> > Maybe it's better to wait for a user to show up, and then we can decide
> > whether we actually want to have them this way, or if there is a better
> > solution for the particular use case.
> >
> > Normally, we'd want to make run-time decisions based on properties
> > of the nodes a driver is working on, not the global machine compatible
> > string.
>
> Yeah, actually this can be dropped. There is no user for it now.
OK applying all but the last patch into omap-for-v3.16/dt branch,
it seems there's no need to separate out the fixes in this case.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
