Document the new flag "no-unlock". Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> --- Does the property need a prefix? I couldn't find any hint. If so, what should it be? "m25p," or "spi-nor," ? Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt index f03be904d3c2..2d305c893ed7 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt @@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ Optional properties: cannot reboot properly if the flash is left in the "wrong" state. This boolean flag can be used on such systems, to denote the absence of a reliable reset mechanism. +- no-unlock : By default, linux unlocks the whole flash because there + are legacy flash devices which are locked by default + after reset. Set this flag if you don't want linux to + unlock the whole flash automatically. In this case you + can control the non-volatile bits by the + flash_lock/flash_unlock tools. Example: -- 2.20.1
