On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:02:02AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2019-12-09 04:47, schrieb Shawn Guo:
> >On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 01:07:09AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> >>The reboot register isn't located inside the DCFG controller,
> >>but in its
> >>own RST controller. Fix it.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 8 +++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> >>b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> >>index 72b9a75976a1..dc75534a4754 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> >>@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
> >>
> >> reboot {
> >> compatible ="syscon-reboot";
> >>- regmap = <&dcfg>;
> >>+ regmap = <&rst>;
> >> offset = <0xb0>;
> >> mask = <0x02>;
> >> };
> >>@@ -161,6 +161,12 @@
> >> big-endian;
> >> };
> >>
> >>+ rst: syscon@1e60000 {
> >>+ compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-rst", "syscon";
> >
> >Compatible "fsl,ls1028a-rst" seems undocumented?
>
> it is the same with fsl,ls1028a-scfg and fsl,ls1028a-dcfg. So maybe
> I should just drop the "fsl,ls1028a-rst". What do you think?
Drop it or document it. I'm fine with either way.
Shawn
