On Monday 05 May 2014 14:45:21 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Ben, Chris]
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Friday 02 May 2014 10:54:59 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> > +static void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev)
> >> > +{
> >> > + u64 dma_addr, paddr, size;
> >> > + int ret;
> >> > +
> >> > + dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> >> > + if (!dev->dma_mask)
> >> > + dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
> >> > +
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * if dma-coherent property exist, call arch hook to setup
> >> > + * dma coherent operations.
> >> > + */
> >> > + if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node)) {
> >> > + set_arch_dma_coherent_ops(dev);
> >> > + dev_dbg(dev, "device is dma coherent\n");
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * if dma-ranges property doesn't exist - just return else
> >> > + * setup the dma offset
> >> > + */
> >> > + ret = of_dma_get_range(dev->of_node, &dma_addr, &paddr, &size);
> >> > + if ((ret == -ENODEV) || (ret < 0)) {
> >> > + dev_dbg(dev, "no dma range information to setup\n");
> >> > + return;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + /* DMA ranges found. Calculate and set dma_pfn_offset */
> >> > + dev->dma_pfn_offset = PFN_DOWN(paddr - dma_addr);
> >> > + dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", dev->dma_pfn_offset);
> >>
> >> Is this effectively the same as an IOMMU that applies a constant offset
> >> to the bus address? Could or should this be done by adding a simple IOMMU
> >> driver instead of adding dma_pfn_offset to struct device?
> >
> > We currently have two dma_map_ops variants on ARM (plus another set for
> > coherent/noncoherent differences, but we can ignore that for the sake
> > of this discussion): one that handles linear mappings and one that
> > handles IOMMUs by calling into the linux/iommu.h APIs.
> >
> > I guess what you mean by 'a simple IOMMU driver' would be another
> > dma_map_ops implementation that is separate from real IOMMUs, right?
>
> I suppose so; it seems like the offset could be managed inside
> arm_dma_ops. My idea of an IOMMU is something that maps bus addresses
> to physical memory addresses. That's what we're doing here; it's just
> that the mapping function is very simple. So why add something new in
> struct device for it?
>
> I think powerpc and tile do something similar in dma_direct_map_page()
> and tile_pci_dma_map_page() (they store the offset in struct
> dev_archdata).
Ah, so the only question is whether to store it in dev_archdata or
in device. I think the argument for using struct device directly
was that it lets us access this field from architecture independent
code. It's not important to the overall design though: we could easily
put it in dev_archdata and call an architecture specific function to
set it, if there are good reasons for keeping it out of the generic
device structure.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
