Hi Laurent, Thank you for your feedback! > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 07 November 2019 18:12 > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: display: Add idk-2121wr binding > > Hi Fabrizio, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:36:36PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > Add binding for the idk-2121wr LVDS panel from Advantech. > > > > Some panel-specific documentation can be found here: > > https://buy.advantech.eu/Displays/Embedded-LCD-Kits-High-Brightness/model-IDK-2121WR-K2FHA2E.htm > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > v2->v3: > > * new patch > > --- > > .../display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..b2ccdc8 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: Advantech IDK-2121WR 21.5" Full-HD dual-LVDS panel > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + - Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +description: | > > + The IDK-2121WR from Advantech is a Full-HD dual-LVDS panel. > > + > > + The panels expects odd pixels from the first port, and even pixels from > > s/panels/panel/ > Maybe s/from the/on the/g ? Will fix > > > + the second port, therefore the ports must be marked accordingly. > > + > > +allOf: > > + - $ref: lvds.yaml# > > + - $ref: ../bus-timings/lvds.yaml# > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + items: > > + - const: advantech,idk-2121wr > > + - {} # panel-lvds, but not listed here to avoid false select > > + > > + data-mapping: > > + const: vesa-24 > > + > > + width-mm: > > + const: 476 > > + > > + height-mm: > > + const: 268 > > + > > + panel-timing: true > > + ports: true > > + > > +additionalProperties: false > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > Shouldn't data-mapping, width-mm, height-mm and ports be required too ? Those are required by lvds.yaml, and this file has a reference to it. Anyhow, I think the best course of action is to merge this with the generic bus-timings/lvds.yaml for the time being, and maybe split them back later on once we have another use case. Thanks, Fab > > As you mentioned in the cover letter, validating ports, port and the new > dual-lvds-*-pixels properties would be nice. I'm not YAML schema > specialist, so I'm fine with a best effort approach here, but as far as > I understand Rob proposed a way forward, could you try it ? > > Apart from that, the bindings look sne to me, so > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > once the above issues get addressed. > > > + > > +examples: > > + - |+ > > + panel-lvds { > > + compatible = "advantech,idk-2121wr", "panel-lvds"; > > + > > + width-mm = <476>; > > + height-mm = <268>; > > + > > + data-mapping = "vesa-24"; > > + > > + panel-timing { > > + clock-frequency = <148500000>; > > + hactive = <1920>; > > + vactive = <1080>; > > + hsync-len = <44>; > > + hfront-porch = <88>; > > + hback-porch = <148>; > > + vfront-porch = <4>; > > + vback-porch = <36>; > > + vsync-len = <5>; > > + }; > > + > > + ports { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + port@0 { > > + reg = <0>; > > + dual-lvds-odd-pixels; > > + panel_in0: endpoint { > > + remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + port@1 { > > + reg = <1>; > > + dual-lvds-even-pixels; > > + panel_in1: endpoint { > > + remote-endpoint = <&lvds1_out>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > +... > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart