Am 02.12.19 um 23:05 schrieb Andreas Färber: > Add DT nodes to SB2 for hardware semaphores in RTD1395 SoC family. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd139x.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd139x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd139x.dtsi > index a3c10ceeb586..586b05350274 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd139x.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd139x.dtsi > @@ -191,3 +191,17 @@ > status = "disabled"; > }; > }; > + > +&sb2 { > + sb2_hd_sem: hwspinlock@0 { > + compatible = "realtek,rtd1195-sb2-sem"; > + reg = <0x0 0x4>; > + #hwlock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + > + sb2_hd_sem_new: hwspinlock@620 { > + compatible = "realtek,rtd1195-sb2-sem"; > + reg = <0x620 0x20>; > + #hwlock-cells = <1>; > + }; Forgot to mention: These last 8 registers (0x20) are a guess, untested. @Realtek: Can someone please check whether RTD1395 has the same nine sem registers as RTD1295? Similarly, this series is lacking a patch for RTD1619 because - same as for RTD1295/RTD1395 - BSP DT only shows the first one (cf. coverletter). Same issue for RTD1319 while at it. Thanks, Andreas > +}; -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)