Re: ACPI vs DT at runtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 22.11.2013 13:00, schrieb Pantelis Antoniou:

As one that's going to be dealing with this, please don't take the DTS
files from the kernel.

If you do this, I can guarantee that within a year almost no ARM board using DT
will boot a mainline kernel.

The reason is that vendors have enough trouble (and failing) tracking a single
tree, adding yet another will just end to the vendor trees as far as the eye can see.

Maybe, maybe, EVMs from silicon vendors will still boot, but I doubt any other
customer board will work.

A bit late (I don't follow the ML (or what happens in the ARM world) closely, but as I've recently read that ARM64 will go UEFI and ACPI, I wonder what was the reasoning behind that decision.

Does anyone really assume we will become high quality UEFI and ACPI blobs from vendors? And such with reasonable support/update periods?

For me that sounds like someone asked dreamers and was unable to adjust those answers in regard to reality.

Regards,

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux