On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:57:14PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is v10 of the sunxi-mmc patch-set David Lanzendörfer and I have been > working on, this has some minor changes since v9, the plan for upstreaming is > still the same: > > The first 2 patches are depenencies which should go in through the clk tree, > Mike can you pick these 2 up please ? : > > "clk: sunxi: factors: automatic reparenting support" > Is uncontroversial and has been favorably reviewed by various people. > > "clk: sunxi: Implement MMC phase control" > Is somewhat more controversial as there has been lots of discussion about > adding a generic phase control method to the clk framework. The problem is > that there has been a lot of talk about such a generic phase control method > but not a single patch. Therefor I would like to move forwards with using > a platform specific method for now. I hereby promise that once we've a generic > method I'll write patches to convert the sunxi code to that method. > > The third patch is the patch adding the actual mmc driver and should go in > through the mmc tree. > > All the other patches are devicetree patches hooking things up, and should > go upstream through Maxime's sunxi-dt tree. Applied patches 4 to 14. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
