On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:17:48 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 27 April 2014 13:07:47 Shaik Ameer Basha wrote:
> > @@ -542,14 +592,41 @@ static int __init exynos_sysmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* Relation between master and System MMU is 1:1. */
> > + node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mmu-masters", 0);
> > + if (node) {
> > + struct platform_device *master = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> > +
> > + if (!master) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "%s: mmu-master '%s' not found\n",
> > + __func__, node->name);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (master->dev.archdata.iommu != NULL) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "%s: '%s' is master of other MMU\n",
> > + __func__, node->name);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * archdata.iommu will be initialized with exynos_iommu_client
> > + * in sysmmu_hook_driver_register().
> > + */
> > + master->dev.archdata.iommu = dev;
> > + }
>
> I think parsing of generic properties like this shouldn't be done
> by the individual driver. It belongs into core iommu code and should
> be done when the devices are probed.
>
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block sysmmu_notifier = {
> > + .notifier_call = &sysmmu_hook_driver_register,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init exynos_iommu_prepare(void)
> > +{
> > + static bool registered = false;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (registered)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = bus_register_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &sysmmu_notifier);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + registered = true;
> > + else
> > + pr_err("Failed to register sysmmu_notifier\n");
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> This also means we should not have notifiers. Put it into core code to
> make sure all IOMMUs are handled the same way.
>
Ok.
Thank you for addressing that.
I am also very interested in the discussion about it in the different thread.
KyongHo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
