On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:30:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 30 April 2014 22:21:30 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > Yes, we *can* move it in kirkwood.dtsi, but IMHO we *should* keep it in > > > the board files. I see the "chosen" node and its properties as _the_ > > > board node. > > > > > > One could argue then, that we should count the memory properties too and > > > put the most common in the SoC dtsi. But you are right, as UART0 is also > > > the UART with boot support, it is likely to be always connected to > > > a more-or-less accessible console output. > > > > > > I really have no strong opinion about it. > > > > Me neithe, but the advantage of putting it in kirkwood.dtsi is that it > > then does not get forgotten, and is always there for bearbox to use. > > I would prefer having it in the board.dts file out of principle, but I > agree it's not very important either way. OK, then i can add my Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> I will try to do some testing over the weekend. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
