On 2019-11-11 08:19, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Fri 08 Nov 01:55 PST 2019, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 11/8/2019 3:10 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2019-11-08 10:37, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > Remove the sdm845 SoC specific compatible to make the driver
> > easily reusable across other SoC's with the same IP block.
> > This will reduce further churn adding any SoC specific
> > compatibles unless really needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> > index faa7d61b9d6c..c175333bb646 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> > @@ -309,4 +309,4 @@ static int qcom_pdc_init(struct device_node
> > *node, struct device_node *parent)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -IRQCHIP_DECLARE(pdc_sdm845, "qcom,sdm845-pdc", qcom_pdc_init);
> > +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(qcom_pdc, "qcom,pdc", qcom_pdc_init);
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>
> How do you want me get this (and the DT change) merged? I can
either take
> these two patches in the irqchip tree, or you arrange them to be
taken
> by the platform maintainers. Your call.
I think it makes sense for you to take these two via your tree (The
driver
and binding doc updates) and the DT node addition for pdc to go via
Andy/Bjorn.
Andy/Bjorn, does that sound fine?
Yes, that sounds good.
Applied to irqchip/next
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
