Hi Rob,
(+CC: David Daney)
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:00 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 1:19 AM Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > These are kernel source code even though they are just two-line wrappers.
> >
> > Files without explicit license information fall back to GPL-2.0-only,
> > which is the project default.
>
> That is true and these are kernel only files, but given they are just
> a wrapper around the .c files, maybe they should have the same
> license?
I just thought it at first
but this wraps two files, with different license.
include/linux/libfdt_env.h: GPLv2 only
scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt*.c : GPLv2+ or BSD-2-Clause
Looking at the include/linux/libfdt_env.h,
I thought GPLv2 only would be preferred for
the kernel-specific code.
If you prefer to align with scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt*.c
I can change it, but I would also respect
the opinion from David Daney, the author of the
following commit:
commit ab25383983fb8d7786696f5371e75e79c3e9a405
Author: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jul 5 18:12:38 2012 +0200
of/lib: Allow scripts/dtc/libfdt to be used from kernel code
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
