On 30.10.19 09:08, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 19-10-30 07:11:37, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> On 23.06.19 13:47, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>> On 10.06.19 14:13, Abel Vesa wrote: >>>> This is another alternative for the RFC: >>>> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flkml.org%2Flkml%2F2019%2F3%2F27%2F545&data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7Cf5f8d8dd37974234fcb108d75d000944%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C637080127051582184&sdata=qZEo1fY1lkTjqZWuuQftYJ5euEsSxjEAqGILCY8ChnU%3D&reserved=0 >>>> >>>> This new workaround proposal is a little bit more hacky but more contained >>>> since everything is done within the irq-imx-gpcv2 driver. >>>> >>>> Basically, it 'hijacks' the registered gic_raise_softirq __smp_cross_call >>>> handler and registers instead a wrapper which calls in the 'hijacked' >>>> handler, after that calling into EL3 which will take care of the actual >>>> wake up. This time, instead of expanding the PSCI ABI, we use a new vendor SIP. >>>> >>>> I also have the patches ready for TF-A but I'll hold on to them until I see if >>>> this has a chance of getting in. >>> >> >> Hi Abel, >> >> Running this workaround doesn't seem to work anymore on 5.4-rcX. Linux >> doesn't boot, with ATF unchanged (includes your workaround changes). I >> can try to add more details to this... >> > > This is happening because the system counter is now enabled on 8mq. > And since the irq-imx-gpcv2 is using as irq_set_affinity the > irq_chip_set_affinity_parent. This is because the actual implementation > of the driver relies on GIC to set the right affinity. On a SoC > that has the wake_request signales linked to the power controller this > works fine. Since the system counter is actually the tick broadcast > device and the set affinity relies only on GIC, the cores can't be > woken up by the broadcast interrupt. > >> Have you tested this for 5.4? Could you update this workaround? Please >> let me know if I missed any earlier update on this (having a cpu-sleep >> idle state). >> > > The solution is to implement the set affinity in the irq-imx-gpcv2 driver > which would allow the gpc to wake up the target core when the broadcast > irq arrives. > > I have a patch for this. I just need to clean it up a little bit. > Unfortunately, it won't go upstream since everuone thinks the gic > should be the one to control the affinity. This obviously doesn't work > on 8mq. > > Currently, I'm at ELCE in Lyon. Will get back at the office tomorrow > and sned you what I have. > Hi Abel, Do you have any news on said patch for testing? That'd be great for my plannings. thanks a lot, martin
