On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:59:17PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:
>
> On 10/25/2019 5:09 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:04:21PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew Murray,
> > >
> > > On 10/21/2019 9:03 PM, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:39:19PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void dw_pcie_link_set_n_fts(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 n_fts)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + u32 val;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
> > > > > + val &= ~PORT_LOGIC_N_FTS;
> > > > > + val |= n_fts;
> > > > > + dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, val);
> > > > > +}
> > > > I notice that pcie-artpec6.c (artpec6_pcie_set_nfts) also writes the FTS
> > > > and defines a bunch of macros to support this. It doesn't make sense to
> > > > duplicate this there. Therefore I think we need to update pcie-artpec6.c
> > > > to use this new function.
> > > I think we can do in a separate patch after these changes get merged and
> > > keep this patch series for intel PCIe driver and required changes in PCIe
> > > DesignWare framework.
> > The pcie-artpec6.c is a DWC driver as well. So I think we can do all this
> > together. This helps reduce the technical debt that will otherwise build up
> > in duplicated code.
> I agree with you to remove duplicated code, but at this point not sure what
> all drivers has defined FTS configuration.
> Reviewing all other DWC drivers and removing them can be done in one single
> separate patch.
I'm not asking to set up an FTS configuration for all DWC drivers, but instead
to move this helper function you've created to somewhere like pcie-designware.c
and call it from this driver and pcie-artpec6.c.
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
>
> Regards,
> Dilip
