On 29/10/2019 18:15, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 18:11 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 29/10/2019 17:45, Pascal Paillet wrote: >>> Fix IRQ flood on low threshold by too ways: >> >> Can you state the issue first ? >> >>> - improve temperature reading resolution, >>> - add an hysteresis to the low threshold: on low threshold interrupt, >>> it is not possible to get the temperature value that has fired the >>> interrupt. The time to acquire a new value is enough for the CPU to >>> become hotter than the current low threshold. > [] >>> Signed-off-by: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@xxxxxx> >>> Change-Id: I3b63b8aab38fd651a165c4e69a2d090b3c6f5db3 >> >> Please remove the Change-Id tag. >> >> Joe, Andy? checkpatch does not see the Change-Id, is it the expected >> behavior? > > Yes. It's after a sign-off so checkpatch doesn't care. Ah, I guess it is for Gerrit but we don't want those Change-Id in the kernel history, right? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
