On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:44 PM Daniel Palmer <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR X11)
> >
> > (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) is preferred. Any reason to differ?
>
> I used the sunxi file as a template and thought they had some
> reason to do that. I'll change it to just GPL-2.0.
That wasn't a choice, but dual license it please.
> > > + - description: thingy.jp BreadBee
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: thingyjp,breadbee
> > > + - const: mstar,infinity
> > > + - const: mstar,infinity3
> >
> > infinity vs. infinity3? What's the difference? It's generally sufficient
> > to just list a board compatible and a SoC compatible.
>
> Apart from some very slight differences (max clock speed, different PWM block)
> they are the same and the PCB for the BreadBee can take either the msc313(i1) or
> msc313e(i3). My v2 patch will remove the mstar,infinity line from there and move
> it to a second board called the breadbee-crust to handle the i1 configuration.
Sounds like you want:
items:
- const: thingyjp,breadbee
- enum:
- mstar,infinity
- mstar,infinity3
If one board can do both chips. Though if the same PCB is populated
differently beyond the SoC, then maybe 2 board compatibles makes
sense.
Why not use the part numbers (msc313...)?
Rob
